Filings, Letters and Testimonies

Proxy Group INGAA Post-technical Conference Supplemental Comments 3-12-08

INGAA's Standards of Conduct Comments on the Commission's new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Docket No. RM07-1

INGAA supports the Commission’s proposed adoption of the Version 1.6 Standards developed by the WGQ of NAESB.

Comments pursuant to the April 9, 2003 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled Amendments to Conform Regulations to Order No. 630

INGAA suggests that, at least within the context of interstate pipeline projects that are subject to the FERC certificate process under the NGA, even more expedited regulations can be adopted.

While INGAA recognizes that the Commission has made efforts to meet certain of the objections raised by the industry in comments on the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NOPR”) in this matter, the Final Rule adopted by the Commission is too broad, and the new requirements are unnecessary to meet the Commission's objectives.

While INGAA recognizes that the Commission has made efforts to meet certain of the objections raised by the industry in comments on the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NOPR”) in this matter, the Final Rule adopted by the Commission is too broad, and the new requirements are ...

INGAA comments submitted pursuant to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NOPR”) issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) on February 12, 2004, regarding “Creditworthiness Standards for Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines”

A request for clarification and rehearing of the Commission’s Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers Order on Rehearing and Clarification,1 Order No. 2004-A, issued April 16, 2004

INGAA submits the following reply comments to the initial comments filed in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in docket RM04-4.

INGAA moves to intervene in Petal v. FERC, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Docket No. 04-1166.

INGAA moves to intervene in AGA et al. v. FERC, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Docket No. 04-1178

INGAA seeks intervention to submit the following comments on the general policy issue presented.

Reply Comments stating that the CIG/Granite State policy is based on an unsupported presumption that shippers with discounted firm primary capacity are similarly situated with any shipper that has previously obtained a discount for either firm or interruptible transportation at any other point on the system.

INGAA petitions for clarification on Docket No. RM01-1.

In INGAA’s view, requiring interstate pipeline storage operators to post daily storage inventory levels is unlikely to achieve the Commission’s transparency objectives

INGAA moves the Court to continue to hold cases in abeyance for 60 days.

Support for a number of regulatory changes for stimulating storage development suggested in the Staff Report .

Answer of INGAA to Notice of Illegal Ex Parte Contact by INGAA in Litigated Cases and Permitted Response and Motion To Exclude Ex Parte Communication From Record